Michigan vs Washington: Which Is Better to Live In?
Michigan ranks #45 of 50 overall and Washington #20 as of the latest release. Michigan is cheaper to live in (cost of living index 96.2 vs 107), collects a similar share of income in taxes, and has a 32% higher violent crime rate. Washington scores higher overall, leading 9 of 11 categories to 1.
- Typical home value is 55% lower in Michigan ($266,292 vs. $591,879 in Washington).
- Center-based infant care, per year is 39% lower in Michigan ($14,064 vs. $23,136 in Washington).
- Property crime rate is 36% lower in Michigan (1,259 vs. 1,975 in Washington).
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | US | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall scorecomposite of 100, rank of 50Gap -19.1 pts | 42.7#45 of 50 · D | 61.8#20 of 50 · B | -19.1 pts | — | WA |
| Cost of living indexUS = 100Gap -10.8 pts (-10%) · US 100 | 96.2#24 of 50 | 107#46 of 50 | -10.8 pts-10% | 100 | MI |
| Left after costs, family of fourearning $75K a yearGap +$42,259 · US -$11,758 | -$5,634#17 of 50 | -$47,893#47 of 50 | +$42,259 | -$11,758 | MI |
| Typical home valuetypical home, modeled estimateGap -$325,587 (-55%) · US $368,697 | $266,292#12 of 50 | $591,879#47 of 50 | -$325,587-55% | $368,697 | MI |
| Total state and local tax burdenshare of incomeGap -0.36 pts · US 8.74% | 8.25%#18 of 50 | 8.61%#22 of 50 | -0.36 pts | 8.74% | Even |
| Violent crime per 100,000per 100,000 residentsGap +132 (+47%) · US 328 | 416#40 of 50 | 284#25 of 50 | +132+47% | 328 | WA |
| Median household incomeGap -$27,000 (-27%) · US $80,903 | $72,389#37 of 50 | $99,389#7 of 50 | -$27,000-27% | $80,903 | WA |
| High school graduation rateGap -2.6 pts · US 85.62% | 81%#45 of 50 | 83.6%#36 of 50 | -2.6 pts | 85.62% | WA |
| Life expectancyGap -1.6 yrs · US 76.9 | 76.8#29 of 50 | 78.4#13 of 50 | -1.6 yrs | 76.9 | WA |
| Net householdsIRS, householdsGap -18,609 · US -33 | -8,770#42 of 50 | +9,839#9 of 50 | -18,609 | -33 | WA |
Cost of living index from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (US = 100). Left after costs from the America's Dashboard affordability engine for a family of four earning $75,000. Typical home value from Zillow Research. Tax burden from WalletHub. Violent crime from the FBI, per 100,000 residents. Income and graduation from the Census Bureau and NCES. Life expectancy from the CDC. Net households from IRS Statistics of Income. US column is the 50-state average or median.
Is Michigan or Washington better to live in?
Washington scores higher overall: 61.8 to 42.7 out of 100, #20 of 50 against #45. Michigan leads 1 of 11 categories, Washington leads 9, and 1 are within 3 points.
| Category | Weight | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | Gap | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economy15% of scoregap -30.4 | 15% | 21.9#50 · F | 52.3#16 · B+ | -30.4 pts | WA |
| Safety12% of scoregap 0 | 12% | 63.9#31 · C+ | 63.9#30 · C+ | 0 pts | Even |
| Health12% of scoregap -12.8 | 12% | 55.4#27 · C+ | 68.2#13 · B+ | -12.8 pts | WA |
| Education12% of scoregap -15.2 | 12% | 42.2#44 · D | 57.4#29 · C+ | -15.2 pts | WA |
| Affordability10% of scoregap +34.2 | 10% | 73.3#22 · B | 39.1#46 · D | +34.2 pts | MI |
| Fiscal Health8% of scoregap -8.1 | 8% | 56.2#32 · C+ | 64.3#17 · B+ | -8.1 pts | WA |
| Growth7% of scoregap -16.5 | 7% | 24.3#41 · C | 40.8#24 · B | -16.5 pts | WA |
| Transportation7% of scoregap -9.2 | 7% | 49.4#27 · C+ | 58.6#8 · A | -9.2 pts | WA |
| Livability7% of scoregap -9.2 | 7% | 24.7#41 · C | 33.9#25 · B | -9.2 pts | WA |
| Outdoor Access6% of scoregap -17.6 | 6% | 17.8#32 · C+ | 35.4#19 · B | -17.6 pts | WA |
| Environment4% of scoregap -31.1 | 4% | 42.0#23 · B | 73.1#3 · A+ | -31.1 pts | WA |
Scores run 0 to 100 within each category; weight is the category's share of the composite. Grades follow rank (1–5 A+, 6–10 A, 11–18 B+, 19–26 B, 27–34 C+, 35–42 C, 43–48 D, 49–50 F). Methodology →
Is Michigan cheaper than Washington?
Michigan is cheaper: cost of living index 96.2 vs 107 in Washington (US = 100). A family of four earning $75,000 keeps $42,259 more a year in Michigan after housing, childcare, utilities, groceries, transportation and taxes.
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | US | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of living indexUS = 100Gap -10.8 pts (-10%) · US 100 | 96.2#24 of 50 | 107#46 of 50 | -10.8 pts-10% | 100 | MI |
| Price level for goodsUS = 100Gap -8.4 pts (-8%) · US 100 | 96#16 of 50 | 104.4#44 of 50 | -8.4 pts-8% | 100 | MI |
| Residential electricity priceGap +6.90¢ (+53%) · US 17.84¢/kWh | 20.01¢/kWh#39 of 50 | 13.11¢/kWh#8 of 50 | +6.90¢+53% | 17.84¢/kWh | WA |
| Residential natural gas priceGap -$6.70 (-38%) · US $15.83/Mcf | $10.92/Mcf#9 of 50 | $17.62/Mcf#38 of 50 | -$6.70-38% | $15.83/Mcf | MI |
| Gasoline priceGap -$0.97 (-24%) · US $3.32/gal | $3.10/gal#16 of 50 | $4.07/gal#47 of 50 | -$0.97-24% | $3.32/gal | MI |
| Center-based infant care, per yearGap -$9,072 (-39%) · US $15,633 | $14,064#21 of 50 | $23,136#47 of 50 | -$9,072-39% | $15,633 | MI |
Cost of living index and the price level for goods from the Bureau of Economic Analysis regional price parities (US = 100). Electricity, natural gas and gasoline prices from the EIA; center-based infant care from Child Care Aware of America. Lower is ahead.
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Adultearning $75,000Gap +$12,295 | +$34,427costs $40,573 | +$22,132costs $52,869 | +$12,295 | MI |
| Couple, No Kidsearning $75,000Gap +$18,273 | +$26,692costs $48,308 | +$8,419costs $66,582 | +$18,273 | MI |
| Family of 4earning $75,000Gap +$42,259 | -$5,634costs $80,634 | -$47,893costs $122,893 | +$42,259 | MI |
| Retiree Coupleearning $75,000Gap +$15,340 | +$39,007costs $35,994 | +$23,667costs $51,333 | +$15,340 | MI |
Income left after housing, childcare, utilities, groceries, transportation and state and local taxes for four household types earning $75,000, from the affordability engine. Negative means typical costs exceed take-home pay.
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HousingGap -$21,370 | $19,753 | $41,123 | -$21,370 | MI |
| ChildcareGap -$18,144 | $28,128 | $46,272 | -$18,144 | MI |
| UtilitiesGap -$518 | $4,618 | $5,136 | -$518 | MI |
| GroceriesGap -$947 | $10,812 | $11,759 | -$947 | MI |
| TransportationGap -$3,048 | $9,743 | $12,791 | -$3,048 | MI |
| State and local taxesGap +$1,768 | $7,580 | $5,812 | +$1,768 | WA |
Annual cost lines for a family of four (two adults, two children). Lower is ahead.
Which has lower taxes, Michigan or Washington?
Michigan and Washington collect a similar share of income in state and local taxes: 8.25% vs 8.61%. Michigan has low sales tax, with income and property taxes in the middle of the pack; Washington has no income tax, high sales tax, with property tax in the middle of the pack.
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | US | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total state and local tax burdenshare of incomeGap -0.36 pts · US 8.74% | 8.25%#18 of 50 | 8.61%#22 of 50 | -0.36 pts | 8.74% | Even |
| Top state income tax ratetop rateGap +6.65 pts · US 5.46% | 6.65%#36 of 50 | none#4 of 50 | +6.65 pts | 5.46% | WA |
| Effective property tax rateeffective rateGap +0.47 pts · US 1.02% | 1.35%#37 of 50 | 0.88%#27 of 50 | +0.47 pts | 1.02% | Even |
| Combined state and local sales taxstate + localGap -3.51 pts · US 6.66% | 6%#13 of 50 | 9.51%#48 of 50 | -3.51 pts | 6.66% | MI |
Total tax burden (state and local taxes as a share of personal income) from WalletHub; top marginal income tax rate, effective property tax rate and combined state and local sales tax from the Tax Foundation. Lower is ahead.
Are homes more expensive in Michigan or Washington?
Homes cost 122% more in Washington: a typical home value of $266,292 in Michigan vs $591,879 in Washington. Buying the typical home takes about $73,945 of income in Michigan and $155,542 in Washington; the median household earns $72,389 and $99,389.
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | US | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Typical home valuetypical home, modeled estimateGap -$325,587 (-55%) · US $368,697 | $266,292#12 of 50 | $591,879#47 of 50 | -$325,587-55% | $368,697 | MI |
| Home value change, one yearGap +4.3 pts · US +1.2% | +4%#7 of 50 | -0.3%#43 of 50 | +4.3 pts | +1.2% | MI |
| Typical rent, largest metrolargest metro, per monthGap -$754 (-33%) · US $1,948 | $1,524#16 of 50 | $2,278#41 of 50 | -$754-33% | $1,948 | MI |
| Income needed to buyto buy the typical homeGap -$81,597 (-52%) · US $100,006 | $73,945#12 of 50 | $155,542#46 of 50 | -$81,597-52% | $100,006 | MI |
| Home value to income ratioGap -2.3x (-38%) · US 4.6x | 3.7x#15 of 50 | 6x#44 of 50 | -2.3x-38% | 4.6x | MI |
Typical home value, one-year change, largest-metro rent and income needed to buy from Zillow Research (a modeled estimate, not a median). Price-to-income ratio divides that typical home value by ACS median household income. Lower is ahead.
| MI | WA | |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly payment, 20% down | $1,370 | $3,045 |
| Income needed vs. median | +2% | +57% |
| Five-year change | +24.1% | +11.1% |
| Market temperature | Cool | Cool |
| Largest metro | Detroit | Seattle |
Income needed vs. median: how far the income required to buy the typical home sits above (+) or below (−) the state's median household income. Temperature blends price cuts, days to pending and inventory against the national market (Zillow).
Do people earn more in Michigan or Washington?
Washington pays more: median household income $99,389 vs $72,389, with unemployment at 5.2% in Michigan and 4.7% in Washington. Across 20 occupations with BLS wage data in both states, Michigan's best-paying metro comes out ahead in 0 after adjusting for local costs and Washington's in 16.
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | US | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median household incomeGap -$27,000 (-27%) · US $80,903 | $72,389#37 of 50 | $99,389#7 of 50 | -$27,000-27% | $80,903 | WA |
| Unemployment rateGap +0.5 pts · US 3.95% | 5.2%#48 of 50 | 4.7%#43 of 50 | +0.5 pts | 3.95% | WA |
| GDP per capitaGap -$34,663 (-39%) · US $64,333 | $55,326#40 of 50 | $89,989#3 of 50 | -$34,663-39% | $64,333 | WA |
| Real GDP growthGap -1.4 pts · US +1.91% | +1.8%#30 of 50 | +3.2%#5 of 50 | -1.4 pts | +1.91% | WA |
| Population growthGap -0.64 pts · US +0.51% | +0.28%#35 of 50 | +0.92%#7 of 50 | -0.64 pts | +0.51% | WA |
Median household income from the Census Bureau ACS; unemployment from BLS LAUS; GDP per capita and real GDP growth from the BEA; population growth from Census Bureau estimates.
Show all 20 occupations
| Occupation | MI | WA | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Software Developers | $143,840$135,210 in Detroit | $201,709$219,863 in Seattle | WA |
| Registered Nurses | $89,989$84,590 in Detroit | $100,733$109,799 in Seattle | WA |
| Accountants & Auditors | $82,872$77,900 in Detroit | $91,449$99,679 in Seattle | WA |
| Family Medicine Physicians | $248,727$233,803 in Detroit | $256,858$279,975 in Seattle | WA |
| Dietitians & Nutritionists | $73,448$69,041 in Detroit | $81,341$88,662 in Seattle | WA |
| Lawyers | $152,435$143,289 in Detroit | $160,128$174,540 in Seattle | WA |
| Civil Engineers | $107,310$100,871 in Detroit | $113,237$123,428 in Seattle | WA |
| Welders, Cutters & Brazers | $51,641$48,543 in Detroit | $57,121$62,262 in Seattle | WA |
| HVAC Mechanics & Installers | $61,151$57,482 in Detroit | $65,972$71,909 in Seattle | WA |
| General & Operations Managers | $107,373$100,931 in Detroit | $111,897$121,968 in Seattle | WA |
| Cooks, Restaurant | $35,851$33,700 in Detroit | $40,081$43,688 in Seattle | WA |
| Police & Sheriff's Patrol Officers | $82,057$77,134 in Detroit | $85,146$92,809 in Seattle | WA |
| Electricians | $68,769$64,643 in Detroit | $71,567$78,008 in Seattle | WA |
| Mental Health Counselors | $60,529$56,897 in Detroit | $62,718$68,363 in Seattle | WA |
| Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) | $59,364$55,802 in Detroit | $61,461$66,992 in Seattle | WA |
| Construction Laborers | $48,624$45,707 in Detroit | $50,324$54,853 in Seattle | WA |
| Secondary School Teachers | $73,631$69,213 in Detroit | $72,237$78,738 in Seattle | Even |
| Sales Representatives (Wholesale/Manufacturing) | $73,498$69,088 in Detroit | $72,161$78,655 in Seattle | Even |
| Computer Systems Analysts | $113,783$106,956 in Detroit | $114,134$124,406 in Seattle | Even |
| Heavy & Tractor-Trailer Truck Drivers | $60,091$56,486 in Detroit | $60,319$65,748 in Seattle | Even |
BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, latest release: the median wage in each state's best-paying metro, adjusted for that metro's cost of living (BEA regional price parities). Sorted by the size of the gap.
Is Michigan safer than Washington?
Washington is safer: 284 violent crimes per 100,000 residents vs 416 in Michigan (FBI). Property crime runs 1,259 and 1,975 per 100,000.
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | US | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Violent crime per 100,000per 100,000 residentsGap +132 (+47%) · US 328 | 416#40 of 50 | 284#25 of 50 | +132+47% | 328 | WA |
| Property crime per 100,000per 100,000 residentsGap -716 (-36%) · US 1,535 | 1,259#13 of 50 | 1,975#46 of 50 | -716-36% | 1,535 | MI |
FBI state crime estimates, offenses per 100,000 residents, latest release. Florida and North Dakota use the FBI's prior-year estimate because the latest year is based on limited data. Lower is ahead.
- Rochester Hills, MI62 violent per 100K
- Kirkland, WA67 violent per 100K
Among each state's 20 tracked cities, latest FBI release.
Which has better schools and health, Michigan or Washington?
Washington scores higher for education (#29 of 50 vs #44), with high school graduation rates of 81% and 83.6%. Washington scores higher for health (#13 vs #27); life expectancy is 76.8 years in Michigan and 78.4 in Washington.
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | US | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAEP math score, grade 8Gap -4 · US 273 | 270#31 of 50 | 274#25 of 50 | -4 | 273 | Even |
| NAEP reading score, grade 8Gap -4 · US 257 | 255#33 of 50 | 259#17 of 50 | -4 | 257 | Even |
| High school graduation rateGap -2.6 pts · US 85.62% | 81%#45 of 50 | 83.6%#36 of 50 | -2.6 pts | 85.62% | WA |
| Life expectancyGap -1.6 yrs · US 76.9 | 76.8#29 of 50 | 78.4#13 of 50 | -1.6 yrs | 76.9 | WA |
| Adults with obesityGap +4.6 pts · US 34.03% | 36.1%#33 of 50 | 31.5%#13 of 50 | +4.6 pts | 34.03% | WA |
| Residents without health insuranceGap -1.4 pts · US 7.6% | 5.1%#8 of 50 | 6.5%#19 of 50 | -1.4 pts | 7.6% | MI |
| Median air quality indexmedian AQI, lower is cleanerGap +12 pts (+43%) · US 38.8 | 40#27 of 50 | 28#4 of 50 | +12 pts+43% | 38.8 | WA |
High school graduation rate from NCES; life expectancy from the CDC National Center for Health Statistics; median air quality index from EPA AirData (lower is cleaner).
- Farmington Hills, MIeducation score 94.2
- Sammamish, WAeducation score 94.4
City education scores blend graduation rate, student-teacher ratio and per-pupil spending (NCES). State education scores combine NAEP math and reading with the graduation rate; health scores combine life expectancy, adult obesity and the uninsured rate. Education: Michigan #44, Washington #29. Health: Michigan #27, Washington #13.
Are more people moving from Michigan to Washington, or from Washington to Michigan?
The Census Bureau's American Community Survey counts 1,859 people (±1,075) moving from Michigan to Washington and 1,723 (±659) the other way, a gap inside the margin of error, so the flows are roughly balanced.
Bars show people (Census ACS, latest release, with 90% margins of error). IRS counts tax-filing households and reports the movers' average income; pairs outside a state's top ten origins and destinations are not published.
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Households moving inIRSGap -50,384 (-41%) | 71,800#20 of 50 | 122,184#9 of 50 | -50,384-41% | WA |
| Households moving outIRSGap -31,775 (-28%) | 80,570#33 of 50 | 112,345#40 of 50 | -31,775-28% | MI |
| Net householdsIRS, householdsGap -18,609 | -8,770#42 of 50 | +9,839#9 of 50 | -18,609 | WA |
| Net households per 1,000 residentsIRS, per 1,000 residentsGap -2.1 | -0.9#38 of 50 | +1.2#18 of 50 | -2.1 | WA |
| Average income of arriving householdsIRSGap -$15,745 (-18%) | $74,145#30 of 50 | $89,890#8 of 50 | -$15,745-18% | WA |
| Average income of departing householdsIRSGap -$22,179 (-22%) | $77,943#18 of 50 | $100,122#7 of 50 | -$22,179-22% | WA |
| Net domestic migration per 1,000 residentsCensus, per 1,000 residentsGap -1.0 | +0.2#31 of 50 | +1.2#24 of 50 | -1.0 | WA |
Each state's total inbound and outbound households and the movers' average income from IRS Statistics of Income; net domestic migration per 1,000 residents from Census Bureau population estimates. Latest releases.
Which is better for retirees, families or remote workers, Michigan or Washington?
Washington is the better fit for families, retirees, remote workers, young professionals, small business, and outdoor enthusiasts. Each index re-weights the same 11 category scores for one kind of household.
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FamiliesGap +9 places | #41score 53.5 | #32score 61 | +9 places | WA |
| RetireesGap +13 places | #30score 59.7 | #17score 66.7 | +13 places | WA |
| Remote WorkersGap +24 places | #43score 41.5 | #19score 54.8 | +24 places | WA |
| Young ProfessionalsGap +20 places | #47score 37.5 | #27score 53.3 | +20 places | WA |
| Small BusinessGap +22 places | #45score 36.9 | #23score 58.8 | +22 places | WA |
| Outdoor EnthusiastsGap +19 places | #32score 36.1 | #13score 57.4 | +19 places | WA |
Rank of 50 on each lifestyle index. A state is called ahead when the ranks are at least 4 places apart.
- FamiliesWashington (#32 vs #41)
- RetireesWashington (#17 vs #30)
- Remote WorkersWashington (#19 vs #43)
- Young ProfessionalsWashington (#27 vs #47)
- Small BusinessWashington (#23 vs #45)
- Outdoor EnthusiastsWashington (#13 vs #32)
Which cities stand out in Michigan and Washington?
Michigan has 24 tracked cities and Washington has 26; the largest are Detroit and Seattle. The table picks the best city in each state for one purpose at a time.
| Best for | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA |
|---|---|---|
| Largest citypopulation | Detroit638,530 people | Seattle754,195 people |
| Highest composite scorecomposite score | Troyscore 69.5 | Redmondscore 71.1 |
| Safest cityviolent crime per 100,000 | Rochester Hills62 violent per 100K | Kirkland67 violent per 100K |
| Cheapest citycost of living index | Battle Creekcost index 90.5 | Yakimacost index 95.5 |
| Most walkableEPA walkability index, 1 to 20 | Ann Arborwalkability 13.5 of 20 | Seattlewalkability 15.8 of 20 |
| Cleanest airmedian air quality index, county | Lansingcounty median AQI 38 | Pascocounty median AQI 23 |
| Best schoolsgraduation rate, % | Farmington Hills94.2% graduation rate | Sammamish94.4% graduation rate |
| Richest citymedian household income | Rochester Hillsmedian income $120,694 | Sammamishmedian income $239,690 |
| Fastest growingpopulation growth, % | Grand Rapids+0.9% growth | Kirkland+3% growth |
Among the 20 tracked cities in each state. Census ACS, FBI, NCES and BEA data, latest releases.
How do Michigan and Washington compare on everything else?
State finances, environment, and getting around. Michigan carries AA credit rating and Washington AA+.
Show fiscal, environment and commuting tables
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | US | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renewable share of electricityGap -61 pts · US 29.34% | 13%#33 of 50 | 74%#4 of 50 | -61 pts | 29.34% | WA |
| FEMA natural disaster risk indexFEMA index, lower is saferGap -31.0 (-75%) · US 29.6 | 10.5#7 of 50 | 41.5#41 of 50 | -31.0-75% | 29.6 | MI |
| Public land shareGap -15.1 pts · US 17.16% | 13.4%#18 of 50 | 28.5%#12 of 50 | -15.1 pts | 17.16% | WA |
| Mean travel time to workGap -2.9 min · US 25.2 min | 24.3 min#20 of 50 | 27.2 min#39 of 50 | -2.9 min | 25.2 min | MI |
| Commuters using public transitGap -3.2 pts · US 2.29% | 1%#28 of 50 | 4.2%#7 of 50 | -3.2 pts | 2.29% | WA |
| Workers working from homeGap -5.2 pts · US 12.28% | 11.2%#33 of 50 | 16.4%#3 of 50 | -5.2 pts | 12.28% | WA |
| Households with a broadband subscriptionGap -2.2 pts · US 92.67% | 92.8%#27 of 50 | 95%#3 of 50 | -2.2 pts | 92.67% | WA |
Renewable share of electricity from the EIA; natural disaster risk from FEMA's National Risk Index; public land share from USGS PAD-US; mean travel time to work, transit and work-from-home shares from the Census Bureau ACS; households with a broadband subscription from the Census Bureau ACS.
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | US | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit ratingindex, 100 = AAAGap -5 pts · US 92.7 | 90#39 of 50 | 95#25 of 50 | -5 pts | 92.7 | WA |
| Rainy-day fund, share of spendingGap +3.7 pts · US 12.39% | 13.5%#13 of 50 | 9.8%#27 of 50 | +3.7 pts | 12.39% | MI |
| Pension funded ratioGap -14 pts · US 74.3% | 68%#35 of 50 | 82%#12 of 50 | -14 pts | 74.3% | WA |
| State debt per capitaGap -$470 (-13%) · US $3,506 | $3,180#31 of 50 | $3,650#36 of 50 | -$470-13% | $3,506 | MI |
| Budget balance, share of spendingGap +1.5 pts · US +4.66% | +4.3%#29 of 50 | +2.8%#40 of 50 | +1.5 pts | +4.66% | MI |
Credit rating index (S&P / Moody's; Michigan AA, Washington AA+), rainy-day fund and budget balance as a share of spending (Pew, NASBO), pension funded ratio (Pew) and state debt per capita (Census Bureau).
Michigan vs Washington: every metric side by side
Every measure behind the category scores, with each state's rank of 50 and the US figure. Michigan is ahead on 21 of 51, Washington on 24, and 6 are even.
Show all 54 metrics
| Measure | MichiganMI | WashingtonWA | GapMI−WA | US | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PopulationGap +2,126,864 (+27%) · US 6.8 million | 10.1 million#10 of 50 | 8 million#13 of 50 | +2,126,864+27% | 6.8 million | MI |
| Median household incomeGap -$27,000 (-27%) · US $80,903 | $72,389#37 of 50 | $99,389#7 of 50 | -$27,000-27% | $80,903 | WA |
| Unemployment rateGap +0.5 pts · US 3.95% | 5.2%#48 of 50 | 4.7%#43 of 50 | +0.5 pts | 3.95% | WA |
| Population growthGap -0.64 pts · US +0.51% | +0.28%#35 of 50 | +0.92%#7 of 50 | -0.64 pts | +0.51% | WA |
| GDP per capitaGap -$34,663 (-39%) · US $64,333 | $55,326#40 of 50 | $89,989#3 of 50 | -$34,663-39% | $64,333 | WA |
| Real GDP growthGap -1.4 pts · US +1.91% | +1.8%#30 of 50 | +3.2%#5 of 50 | -1.4 pts | +1.91% | WA |
| Violent crime per 100,000per 100,000 residentsGap +132 (+47%) · US 328 | 416#40 of 50 | 284#25 of 50 | +132+47% | 328 | WA |
| Property crime per 100,000per 100,000 residentsGap -716 (-36%) · US 1,535 | 1,259#13 of 50 | 1,975#46 of 50 | -716-36% | 1,535 | MI |
| High school graduation rateGap -2.6 pts · US 85.62% | 81%#45 of 50 | 83.6%#36 of 50 | -2.6 pts | 85.62% | WA |
| NAEP math score, grade 4Gap -2 · US 237 | 235#34 of 50 | 238#26 of 50 | -2 | 237 | Even |
| NAEP math score, grade 8Gap -4 · US 273 | 270#31 of 50 | 274#25 of 50 | -4 | 273 | Even |
| NAEP reading score, grade 4Gap -7 · US 214 | 209#44 of 50 | 216#19 of 50 | -7 | 214 | Even |
| NAEP reading score, grade 8Gap -4 · US 257 | 255#33 of 50 | 259#17 of 50 | -4 | 257 | Even |
| Life expectancyGap -1.6 yrs · US 76.9 | 76.8#29 of 50 | 78.4#13 of 50 | -1.6 yrs | 76.9 | WA |
| Adults with obesityGap +4.6 pts · US 34.03% | 36.1%#33 of 50 | 31.5%#13 of 50 | +4.6 pts | 34.03% | WA |
| Residents without health insuranceGap -1.4 pts · US 7.6% | 5.1%#8 of 50 | 6.5%#19 of 50 | -1.4 pts | 7.6% | MI |
| Typical home valuetypical home, modeled estimateGap -$325,587 (-55%) · US $368,697 | $266,292#12 of 50 | $591,879#47 of 50 | -$325,587-55% | $368,697 | MI |
| Home value change, one yearGap +4.3 pts · US +1.2% | +4%#7 of 50 | -0.3%#43 of 50 | +4.3 pts | +1.2% | MI |
| Typical rent, largest metrolargest metro, per monthGap -$754 (-33%) · US $1,948 | $1,524#16 of 50 | $2,278#41 of 50 | -$754-33% | $1,948 | MI |
| Income needed to buyto buy the typical homeGap -$81,597 (-52%) · US $100,006 | $73,945#12 of 50 | $155,542#46 of 50 | -$81,597-52% | $100,006 | MI |
| Cost of living indexUS = 100Gap -10.8 pts (-10%) · US 100 | 96.2#24 of 50 | 107#46 of 50 | -10.8 pts-10% | 100 | MI |
| Home value to income ratioGap -2.3x (-38%) · US 4.6x | 3.7x#15 of 50 | 6x#44 of 50 | -2.3x-38% | 4.6x | MI |
| Residential electricity priceGap +6.90¢ (+53%) · US 17.84¢/kWh | 20.01¢/kWh#39 of 50 | 13.11¢/kWh#8 of 50 | +6.90¢+53% | 17.84¢/kWh | WA |
| Residential natural gas priceGap -$6.70 (-38%) · US $15.83/Mcf | $10.92/Mcf#9 of 50 | $17.62/Mcf#38 of 50 | -$6.70-38% | $15.83/Mcf | MI |
| Gasoline priceGap -$0.97 (-24%) · US $3.32/gal | $3.10/gal#16 of 50 | $4.07/gal#47 of 50 | -$0.97-24% | $3.32/gal | MI |
| Price level for goodsUS = 100Gap -8.4 pts (-8%) · US 100 | 96#16 of 50 | 104.4#44 of 50 | -8.4 pts-8% | 100 | MI |
| Center-based infant care, per yearGap -$9,072 (-39%) · US $15,633 | $14,064#21 of 50 | $23,136#47 of 50 | -$9,072-39% | $15,633 | MI |
| Total state and local tax burdenshare of incomeGap -0.36 pts · US 8.74% | 8.25%#18 of 50 | 8.61%#22 of 50 | -0.36 pts | 8.74% | Even |
| Top state income tax ratetop rateGap +6.65 pts · US 5.46% | 6.65%#36 of 50 | none#4 of 50 | +6.65 pts | 5.46% | WA |
| Effective property tax rateeffective rateGap +0.47 pts · US 1.02% | 1.35%#37 of 50 | 0.88%#27 of 50 | +0.47 pts | 1.02% | Even |
| Combined state and local sales taxstate + localGap -3.51 pts · US 6.66% | 6%#13 of 50 | 9.51%#48 of 50 | -3.51 pts | 6.66% | MI |
| Credit ratingindex, 100 = AAAGap -5 pts · US 92.7 | 90#39 of 50 | 95#25 of 50 | -5 pts | 92.7 | WA |
| Rainy-day fund, share of spendingGap +3.7 pts · US 12.39% | 13.5%#13 of 50 | 9.8%#27 of 50 | +3.7 pts | 12.39% | MI |
| Pension funded ratioGap -14 pts · US 74.3% | 68%#35 of 50 | 82%#12 of 50 | -14 pts | 74.3% | WA |
| State debt per capitaGap -$470 (-13%) · US $3,506 | $3,180#31 of 50 | $3,650#36 of 50 | -$470-13% | $3,506 | MI |
| Budget balance, share of spendingGap +1.5 pts · US +4.66% | +4.3%#29 of 50 | +2.8%#40 of 50 | +1.5 pts | +4.66% | MI |
| Median air quality indexmedian AQI, lower is cleanerGap +12 pts (+43%) · US 38.8 | 40#27 of 50 | 28#4 of 50 | +12 pts+43% | 38.8 | WA |
| Renewable share of electricityGap -61 pts · US 29.34% | 13%#33 of 50 | 74%#4 of 50 | -61 pts | 29.34% | WA |
| FEMA natural disaster risk indexFEMA index, lower is saferGap -31.0 (-75%) · US 29.6 | 10.5#7 of 50 | 41.5#41 of 50 | -31.0-75% | 29.6 | MI |
| Public land shareGap -15.1 pts · US 17.16% | 13.4%#18 of 50 | 28.5%#12 of 50 | -15.1 pts | 17.16% | WA |
| Mean travel time to workGap -2.9 min · US 25.2 min | 24.3 min#20 of 50 | 27.2 min#39 of 50 | -2.9 min | 25.2 min | MI |
| Commuters using public transitGap -3.2 pts · US 2.29% | 1%#28 of 50 | 4.2%#7 of 50 | -3.2 pts | 2.29% | WA |
| Workers working from homeGap -5.2 pts · US 12.28% | 11.2%#33 of 50 | 16.4%#3 of 50 | -5.2 pts | 12.28% | WA |
| Households with a broadband subscriptionGap -2.2 pts · US 92.67% | 92.8%#27 of 50 | 95%#3 of 50 | -2.2 pts | 92.67% | WA |
| Households moving inIRSGap -50,384 (-41%) · US 78,682 | 71,800#20 of 50 | 122,184#9 of 50 | -50,384-41% | 78,682 | WA |
| Households moving outIRSGap -31,775 (-28%) · US 78,715 | 80,570#33 of 50 | 112,345#40 of 50 | -31,775-28% | 78,715 | MI |
| Net householdsIRS, householdsGap -18,609 · US -33 | -8,770#42 of 50 | +9,839#9 of 50 | -18,609 | -33 | WA |
| Net households per 1,000 residentsIRS, per 1,000 residentsGap -2.1 · US +0.4 | -0.9#38 of 50 | +1.2#18 of 50 | -2.1 | +0.4 | WA |
| Average income of arriving householdsIRSGap -$15,745 (-18%) · US $77,690 | $74,145#30 of 50 | $89,890#8 of 50 | -$15,745-18% | $77,690 | WA |
| Average income of departing householdsIRSGap -$22,179 (-22%) · US $77,024 | $77,943#18 of 50 | $100,122#7 of 50 | -$22,179-22% | $77,024 | WA |
| Net domestic migration per 1,000 residentsCensus, per 1,000 residentsGap -1.0 · US +1.1 | +0.2#31 of 50 | +1.2#24 of 50 | -1.0 | +1.1 | WA |
| Left after costs, family of fourearning $75K a yearGap +$42,259 · US -$11,758 | -$5,634#17 of 50 | -$47,893#47 of 50 | +$42,259 | -$11,758 | MI |
| Left after costs, single adultearning $75K a yearGap +$12,295 · US +$31,418 | +$34,427#18 of 50 | +$22,132#44 of 50 | +$12,295 | +$31,418 | MI |
| Left after costs, retiree coupleearning $75K a yearGap +$15,340 · US +$35,970 | +$39,007#19 of 50 | +$23,667#45 of 50 | +$15,340 | +$35,970 | MI |
Every metric in the registry, direction-aware: ahead means better for a resident. Ranks are among the states with data. Sources are listed at the foot of the page.
Key takeaways
What the Michigan and Washington numbers say when read together.
Washington ranks higher overall
Washington leads 9 of the 11 categories to Michigan's 1, with 1 even; Michigan is ahead on affordability. Across all 51 measures with data on both sides, Michigan is ahead on 21 and Washington on 24.
Michigan is cheaper day to day
Michigan's cost of living index is 96.2 against 107 in Washington (US = 100). The typical home costs $266,292 in Michigan and $591,879 in Washington. A family of four on $75,000 keeps -$5,634 a year after typical costs in Michigan and -$47,893 in Washington.
Tax burdens are close
Michigan collects 8.25% of income in state and local taxes (low sales tax, with income and property taxes in the middle of the pack); Washington collects 8.61% (no income tax, high sales tax, with property tax in the middle of the pack).
Washington pays more and is safer
Median household income is $72,389 in Michigan and $99,389 in Washington, with unemployment at 5.2% and 4.7%. Violent crime runs 416 per 100,000 residents in Michigan and 284 in Washington.
Moves between the two run about even
1,859 people moved from Michigan to Washington and 1,723 the other way, a gap inside the survey's margin of error.
Washington fits families and retirees better
For families, Michigan ranks #41 of 50 and Washington #32; for retirees, Michigan ranks #30 and Washington #17.
Michigan vs Washington: frequently asked questions
Is Michigan or Washington better to live in?
Michigan ranks #45 of 50 overall and Washington #20 as of the latest release. Michigan is cheaper to live in (cost of living index 96.2 vs 107), collects a similar share of income in taxes, and has a 32% higher violent crime rate. Washington scores higher overall, leading 9 of 11 categories to 1.
Is Michigan cheaper than Washington?
Michigan is cheaper than Washington: cost of living index 96.2 vs 107 (US = 100). A family of four earning $75,000 would have -$5,634 left after typical housing, childcare, utilities, groceries, transportation and taxes in Michigan, and -$47,893 in Washington. The typical home value is $266,292 in Michigan and $591,879 in Washington.
Which has lower taxes, Michigan or Washington?
Michigan and Washington have similar tax burdens: 8.25% vs 8.61% of income in state and local taxes. Michigan's top income tax rate is 6.65%, its effective property tax rate 1.35% and its combined sales tax 6%; Washington's are zero, 0.88% and 9.51%.
Is Michigan safer than Washington?
Washington is safer: 284 violent crimes per 100,000 residents vs 416 in Michigan, per the FBI. Michigan ranks #40 of 50 for violent crime and Washington #25. Property crime is 1,259 per 100,000 in Michigan and 1,975 in Washington. The safest tracked cities are Rochester Hills, MI, and Kirkland, WA.
Are homes more expensive in Michigan or Washington?
Homes are 122% more expensive in Washington: the typical home value is $266,292 in Michigan and $591,879 in Washington. Buying the typical home takes about $73,945 of household income in Michigan and $155,542 in Washington, against median incomes of $72,389 and $99,389.
Do people earn more in Michigan or Washington?
Washington pays more: median household income is $99,389 vs $72,389 in Michigan, per the Census Bureau. Unemployment is 5.2% in Michigan and 4.7% in Washington. Across 20 occupations with BLS wage data in both states, Michigan's best-paying metro comes out ahead in 0 after adjusting for local costs and Washington's in 16, with 4 even.
Are more people moving from Michigan to Washington or from Washington to Michigan?
The Census Bureau's American Community Survey counts 1,859 people (±1,075) moving from Michigan to Washington and 1,723 (±659) the other way, a gap inside the margin of error, so the flows are roughly balanced.
Which is better for retirees, Michigan or Washington?
Washington is the better fit for retirees: #17 of 50 on the retiree index vs #30 for Michigan. Michigan has low sales tax, with income and property taxes in the middle of the pack; Washington has no income tax, high sales tax, with property tax in the middle of the pack. A retiree couple on $75,000 would have +$39,007 left after typical costs in Michigan and +$23,667 in Washington.
Which is better for families, Michigan or Washington?
Washington is the better fit for families: #32 of 50 on the families index vs #41 for Michigan. Center-based infant care costs $14,064 a year in Michigan and $23,136 in Washington. High school graduation rates are 81% and 83.6%. A family of four on $75,000 keeps -$5,634 after typical costs in Michigan and -$47,893 in Washington.
Is Washington better than Michigan?
Yes: Washington ranks higher than Michigan overall, #20 of 50 vs #45, with a composite score of 61.8 to 42.7. Washington leads 9 of 11 categories and Michigan leads 1, including affordability. Which is better for you depends on how you weigh cost, safety, schools, taxes and pay.
Compare a different pair
Swap either state, or jump to the matchups people open alongside Michigan vs Washington.
Why this pair is featured: most-searched matchup.