America’s Dashboard
Rankings · Environment · 4% of the overall score

The Best States for Environment (2026)

Maine ranks #1 for environment in 2026 with a score of 77.1/100, followed by Vermont (76.3), Washington (73.1), Idaho (70.0), and Oregon (64.2). Scores combine EPA air quality, EIA renewable energy percentage, and FEMA natural disaster risk data. Louisiana ranks last at 16.0.

#1 for environment · #9 overall
Maine77.1
Environment score out of 100
Runner-up
Vermont 76.3
Last place
Louisiana 16.0
Full Maine profile →

Environment score by state

Darker states score higher. Hover, focus, or tap a state to see its rank, score, and grade in the panel.

Key Takeaways

  1. Maine leads the nation in environment with a score of 77.1, 0.8 points ahead of #2 Vermont. The top 3 is rounded out by Washington at 73.1.

  2. The Northeast dominates: 5 of the top 10 states are in the Northeast. Maine, Vermont, New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island lead the way for the region.

  3. The 61.1-point gap between #1 Maine and #50 Louisiana is one of the widest spreads across all categories. The median state scores 40.6, meaning half of all states fall below this threshold.

  4. The bottom 5 — Missouri, California, Mississippi, South Carolina, Louisiana — are concentrated in the South, with 3 of 5 from that region. Louisiana ranks last with a score of 16.0, signaling persistent challenges in environment.

  5. Maine's #1 environment ranking aligns with its strong overall position at #9 in our composite rankings. High environment performance often correlates with strength in other categories, reinforcing Maine's position as a top-tier state.

All 50 states ranked by environment

The top 20 are listed first; open the rest of the table for all 50.

#  StateGradeEnvironment scoreOverall scoreKey metricsRegion
1MaineA+77.171.6AQI 34 · 78% renewable · 12.7 disaster riskNortheast
2VermontA+76.374.0AQI 34 · 99% renewable · 16.4 disaster riskNortheast
3WashingtonA+73.161.8AQI 28 · 74% renewable · 41.5 disaster riskWest
4IdahoA+70.078.4AQI 34 · 70% renewable · 21.7 disaster riskWest
5OregonA+64.250.9AQI 32 · 67% renewable · 40.4 disaster riskWest
6MontanaA62.975.0AQI 27 · 53% renewable · 49.8 disaster riskWest
7New YorkA58.454.9AQI 36 · 30% renewable · 3.8 disaster riskNortheast
8HawaiiA56.964.8AQI 24 · 30% renewable · 54 disaster riskWest
9MassachusettsA54.470.0AQI 37 · 24% renewable · 3.6 disaster riskNortheast
10Rhode IslandA53.462.0AQI 35 · 12% renewable · 2.4 disaster riskNortheast
11South DakotaB+53.379.3AQI 35 · 80% renewable · 66.1 disaster riskMidwest
12MinnesotaB+51.070.4AQI 36 · 36% renewable · 26.7 disaster riskMidwest
13New MexicoB+50.830.6AQI 40 · 53% renewable · 27.4 disaster riskWest
14AlaskaB+49.544.3AQI 25 · 33% renewable · 100 disaster riskWest
15VirginiaB+48.067.7AQI 37 · 10% renewable · 5.5 disaster riskSouth
16KansasB+48.055.1AQI 40 · 61% renewable · 41.3 disaster riskMidwest
17IowaB+46.769.2AQI 43 · 67% renewable · 38.3 disaster riskMidwest
18WyomingB+46.679.9AQI 35 · 33% renewable · 38 disaster riskWest
19MarylandB46.153.6AQI 40 · 12% renewable · 0 disaster riskNortheast
20ColoradoB45.964.7AQI 42 · 39% renewable · 17.9 disaster riskWest
Show all 50 states ↓
#  StateGradeEnvironment scoreOverall scoreKey metricsRegion
21New HampshireB45.283.4AQI 37 · 14% renewable · 15.6 disaster riskNortheast
22NebraskaB44.171.1AQI 34 · 34% renewable · 48.5 disaster riskMidwest
23MichiganB42.042.7AQI 40 · 13% renewable · 10.5 disaster riskMidwest
24NevadaB41.545.8AQI 41 · 32% renewable · 25.7 disaster riskWest
25TexasB40.852.2AQI 43 · 37% renewable · 24 disaster riskSouth
26WisconsinB40.670.6AQI 37 · 13% renewable · 25.4 disaster riskMidwest
27North DakotaC+38.575.5AQI 38 · 41% renewable · 52.7 disaster riskMidwest
28IndianaC+38.459.2AQI 41 · 15% renewable · 16.9 disaster riskMidwest
29ConnecticutC+38.366.9AQI 39 · 5% renewable · 15.6 disaster riskNortheast
30PennsylvaniaC+38.056.9AQI 40 · 6% renewable · 13.4 disaster riskNortheast
31New JerseyC+37.455.0AQI 40 · 8% renewable · 16.6 disaster riskNortheast
32OklahomaC+37.343.0AQI 46 · 52% renewable · 34.6 disaster riskSouth
33TennesseeC+36.257.1AQI 40 · 14% renewable · 25 disaster riskSouth
34OhioC+35.252.1AQI 43 · 6% renewable · 8.3 disaster riskMidwest
35North CarolinaC34.659.1AQI 41 · 13% renewable · 24 disaster riskSouth
36FloridaC34.059.9AQI 41 · 10% renewable · 22.5 disaster riskSouth
37DelawareC33.553.6AQI 41 · 6% renewable · 19.9 disaster riskNortheast
38GeorgiaC32.155.4AQI 45 · 12% renewable · 13.4 disaster riskSouth
39IllinoisC31.047.6AQI 43 · 20% renewable · 31.2 disaster riskMidwest
40KentuckyC28.944.8AQI 41 · 9% renewable · 33.6 disaster riskSouth
41West VirginiaC28.842.8AQI 40 · 8% renewable · 36.7 disaster riskSouth
42UtahC28.575.4AQI 44 · 15% renewable · 28.3 disaster riskWest
43AlabamaD28.348.5AQI 42 · 9% renewable · 31.1 disaster riskSouth
44ArizonaD25.947.8AQI 45 · 16% renewable · 31.5 disaster riskWest
45ArkansasD25.840.1AQI 42 · 12% renewable · 39.6 disaster riskSouth
46MissouriD25.351.0AQI 42 · 16% renewable · 44.5 disaster riskMidwest
47CaliforniaD24.740.2AQI 48 · 52% renewable · 56.3 disaster riskWest
48MississippiD22.741.9AQI 43 · 5% renewable · 36.4 disaster riskSouth
49South CarolinaF21.149.0AQI 44 · 8% renewable · 39.2 disaster riskSouth
50LouisianaF16.030.0AQI 43 · 5% renewable · 52 disaster riskSouth

Best and worst states for environment

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best state for the environment in 2026?

Maine ranks #1 for environment in 2026 with a score of 77.1/100, followed by Vermont (76.3) and Washington (73.1). Rankings combine three key metrics: median air quality index from EPA AirData (40% weight, inverted — lower AQI is better), renewable energy percentage from EIA State Electricity Profiles (30%), and natural disaster risk from FEMA's National Risk Index (30%, inverted — lower risk is better). Maine benefits from clean air, strong renewable energy adoption, and low disaster exposure. Environmental quality affects health, recreation, and long-term sustainability for residents.

Which states have the worst environmental quality?

The states with the worst environmental scores in 2026 are Louisiana (16.0/100), South Carolina (21.1), and Mississippi (22.7). These states face challenges including poorer air quality from industrial activity or wildfires, lower adoption of renewable energy sources, and/or higher natural disaster risk from hurricanes, tornadoes, flooding, or earthquakes. The gap between the best and worst environment scores is 61.1 points. Environmental quality directly affects health outcomes — states with poor air quality tend to have higher rates of respiratory disease and lower life expectancies, creating a compounding disadvantage.

How is the environment score calculated?

The environment score combines three metrics from federal agencies: median air quality index from EPA AirData (40% weight, inverted so lower AQI scores better — lower AQI means cleaner air), renewable energy percentage from EIA State Electricity Profiles (30% weight — higher renewable adoption scores better), and natural disaster risk from FEMA's National Risk Index (30% weight, inverted so lower risk scores better). Each metric is normalized to a 0-100 scale. Environment carries a 4% weight in the composite score. This combination captures both the quality of the air you breathe and the long-term sustainability and safety of living in that state.

Do environmental rankings affect health outcomes?

Yes, significantly. States with clean air, low pollution, and access to green spaces tend to have better health outcomes including lower rates of asthma, respiratory disease, and certain cancers. The correlation between environmental quality and health scores is noticeable in our data — many states that rank well for environment also rank well for health. Poor air quality, which is captured in our environmental score through EPA AirData, is linked to cardiovascular disease, lung cancer, and premature death. Beyond air quality, natural disaster risk creates acute health and safety threats, and states with higher disaster exposure face recurring costs that divert resources from other public services.

Which states lead in renewable energy adoption?

States leading in renewable energy tend to be in the West and Northeast, where wind, solar, and hydroelectric resources are abundant and state policies have incentivized clean energy investment. Renewable energy percentage — capturing what share of a state's electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro, biomass, and geothermal — accounts for 30% of the environment score. States with strong renewable energy programs score higher even if other environmental factors are moderate. Renewable adoption reduces air pollution and contributes to energy independence, though it's worth noting that the energy transition is happening at different speeds across states depending on existing infrastructure, fossil fuel industry presence, and state policy.

How the Environment Score Is Calculated

Our environment score combines median air quality index from EPA AirData (40%, inverted — lower AQI is better), renewable energy percentage from EIA State Electricity Profiles (30%), and natural disaster risk from FEMA's National Risk Index (30%, inverted — lower risk is better). Environment carries a 4% weight in the composite. States with clean air, high renewable energy adoption, and low disaster risk score highest. Western states with strong renewable energy programs and rural states with low pollution tend to lead.

Explore Other Categories